The integrity of the outputs of REF relies on the integrity of those working on REF. REF members are selected because of their experience and expertise, and because, as a group, they provide a diversity of views and experiences that represent the diversity of the research sector. When individuals accept a role as part of the REF panel process (henceforth REF members) they are expected to apply their abilities and knowledge diligently and honestly in delivering their role. REF members are expected to adhere to:
- the Seven Principles of Public Life (the Nolan Principles)
- the principles in the UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity
- the UKRI code of conduct
This expectation applies to panel discussions and assessment processes, both of which must be undertaken with fairness, transparency and consistency. REF members have roles outside of the REF exercise, and their views on sector matters may be sought and widely reported. As long as REF member behaviour is in accordance with the seven principles of public life and UKRI policy, their participation in the REF should not act as a barrier to their wider activities.
If, during a REF member’s tenure, an issue comes to light that might impact upon their ability to deliver REF responsibilities, including behaviour that sits outside of the standards highlighted above, a decision by UKRI will be taken on whether their role will continue.
Should you wish to raise a concern about a REF member that relates specifically to their ability to deliver in their REF role, please refer to the UKRI make a complaint page. If a formal complaint is made about a panel member, it will be reviewed and handled in line with UKRI processes: UKRI Complaints processes or UKRI whistle blowing policy.